I don't think she wore bras before her surgery either.
thank you for the explanation but would it be so painful you wouldn't wear one for a couple of hours for a meeting with a religious leader where you're going to be photographed? If she has all these ambitions and wants to be viewed as a serious person/humanitarian I'd think she'd be willing to make this compromise on occasion
She may be a celebrity and someone who has the ear of world leaders but to her larger than average brood she is just mom.
Angelina and her six children touched down in Los Angeles, California, from London on Friday night.
The 41-year-old was escorted through arrivals by her oldest daughter Zahara as Vivienne and Know trotted along beside her while Maddox and Pax happily brought up the rear.
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-4326210/Angelina-Jolie-six-children-arrive-Los-Angeles.html#ixzz4bh09Sg7b
You don't nessesarily need to wear a bra, with that jersey wearing some kind of nipple pastie/cover would suffice, she just needs to dim the headlights.
or wear a jacket over her top
Most likely her "nipples" are chest skin her doc manipulated to look like a nipple. If she did a full mastectomy ( which I believe she did) the docs wouldn't leave her nipple tissue. Therefore she will always have "headlights". I agree. She needs to wear a silicone pasty of sorts.
I read that she did not have the nipples removed but no bra or something in this situation is tacky
This. The DM's commentary on women irritates me more than Angie's need for a nipple cover.
I agree that the DM is despicable. Usually about every woman they report on. But this isn't new to them or other outlets, which is why it's incomprehensible to me that she, knowing how everyone jumps to clutch their pearls over visible nipples, continues to flash them in professional, somber settings where she's trying to convey a message that has nothing to do with her own sexuality. It detracts from her message every single time, yet she does it every single time. I can't really understand her. Nipple covers, camisoles, a jacket, whatever just do what you have to do to make sure the message isn't your nipples but about the causes that you're saying are so important to you.
I confess, I sometimes go out without a bra, and know the reaction I get from women. I'd NEVER go into any professional setting like that because it would undercut anything I was trying to accomplish.
her lack of nipple coverage doesn't irritate me. I just think it's a mistake
Well at any rate, the nipples achieved lots of publicity. Maybe that's taking over for using the kids so much.
Don't care what she has had done, Nipples are distracting small or big and hers aren't small!! Fine if you are traveling and shopping but meeting with prominent people, come on. What's the focus?
Aid worker claims Angelina Jolie adopted son Maddox using false information
Â© Camilla Morandi/Rex USA
A Cambodian aid worker is making extraordinary claims about Angelina Jolie's 2003 adoption of eldest son Maddox Jolie-Pitt.
Mounh Sarath, 51, tells Britain's The Sun on Sunday that he signed official papers in Cambodia claiming he was Maddox's father in order to help speed along the boy's adoption all those years ago.
He also claims he still has legal power of attorney over the now-teenager and showed The Sun on Sunday the adoption document filed with a court in Cambodia's Battambong province in August 2003 to back up his claims.
He explained the lie, telling the paper, "She had to change his name, so the only way was for me to do it. I said he's my son."
"In court documents, Maddox is still my son," he said. "She never cleared this up."
Despite his claims, there is no evidence that either Angelina, 41, or then-husband Billy Bob Thornton, 61 -- who was also involved in Maddox's adoption before he and Angelina divorced -- knew what Mounh did.
According to MailOnline, Angelina has previously said she went to "great lengths to ensure Maddox did not have a living birth mother in Cambodia" and that she would "never rob a mother of her child."
Maddox's adoption took place at a time when the United States was imposing tougher restrictions on adopting kids from Cambodia because of trafficking concerns.
Lauryn Galindo -- the adoption agent who handled Angelina and Maddox's case -- spent time in prison after reportedly falsifying the names, birth dates and birth places of Cambodian children who were adopted by Americans. (She denied this at the time, telling ABC's "20/20," "I have never been involved or charged with anything other than paperwork errors. And that's what I pled to, that's what I'm going to go to prison for."
While making his serious claims, Mounh -- who met Angelina through charity work -- also revealed he and the star have since fallen out. "I would be happy if Cambodia didn't see her again," he said.
Angelina was in Cambodia in February to promote "First They Killed My Father," a movie she directed for Netflix about the Khmer Rouge and Cambodian genocide. Maddox worked on the film.
Neither Angelina nor soon-to-be ex-husbandBrad Pitt, who legally adopted Maddox after settling down with Angelina, have commented on the claims.
In addition to Maddox, the former couple are also parents to son Pax, 13, who was adopted from Vietman; daughter Zahara, 12, who was adopted from Ethiopia; and biological children Shiloh, 10, who was born in Namibia, plus 8-year-old twins Knox and Vivienne, who were born in France.
Out of curiosity, consider the kids extensive places of birth, do they have a problem with the passports and visas? What nationality do they hold? Or it's just the allure of exotic location? I guess it's American for the adopted ones. But how about the biological ones?
And first place he goes to is The Sun?